Tag Archives: Adoptee Discrimination

Phantom kinship exists for nearly all adoptees

Rudy Owens’ phantom kin: two of his biological cousins and one of his paternal biological grandfathers, on his biological father’s side (date of photo unknown, 1970s)

For no reason other than my curious mind, I went down the rabbit hole of phantom biological kinship today—May 18,2025.

I call it “phantom kinship” because most U.S. born—and nearly all intercountry— adoptees’ biological relations are outlawed. This legal denial of biological kin connections ensures this broken system continues and that it will never have a moral and legal reckoning, like what has happened, partially, in the United Kingdom and Australia.

As I explained in my book on my own story, illustrating the larger post-World War II adoption system, I have kin I barely know.

Two of my kin are half-siblings, on my biological father’s side of my biological family. I met one of them in fall 2014, which is the subject of the first chapter of my book.

I have not met my second half-sister, the younger of the pair. I would still like to meet her, as she is one of my closest biological relatives. I am not sure I will, based on how the oldest of two of them reacted to meeting me.

Naturally I think of my siblings, regardless of how I’m viewed by my paternal side of the family as a bastard—in its fullest sociological sense of being an agent of chaos, a form of contagion and harm.

On this day I randomly did some online sleuthing and quickly found where my still-unknown and youngest half-sister lives.

For people who are not adoptees, you will never understand this, and I will not try to explain it to you. Severed kinship is like a ghost limb—it exists, and yet it doesn’t exist. You think of it, and yet you will never know its meaning so long as the relationship is hidden or never made.

My deceased kin who never met me

During my research today, I also found other kin I had never met. They include two of my biological cousins on the paternal sides of my family.

They are the son and daughter of one of my deceased biological father’s also-deceased older sisters. I’m nearly 100 percent certain these “phantom cousins” never knew I existed. However, this older sister of my biological father knew about me.  The siblings, my “phantom cousins,” have died. They both had chronic diseases and passed away before the death of their mother (my aunt) in 2013.

One of the photos I found, of my now deceased “phantom cousins,” includes my biological grandfather. He too never knew I was born. I can’t confirm that, but from what I know, my secretive existence was mostly hidden from him too.

The first photo shared, at the top, is very old, of these brother and sister “phantom cousins,” with my biological grandfather. It probably was taken in the early or mid-1970s.

I never met this biological aunt, thought I met another biological aunt, a sister to her and my biological father.  That too is described in my book. And she is dead now too.

These sisters knew about me from family stories told about me. Most of these stories were lies, which solidified my “bastard” status after I met my bio-dad. It is a messy story, and I am not sharing the details to entertain or titillate readers who want cheap thrills from dark secrets about adoptees, just for selfish and puerile pleasure.

I mostly never show my severed-kin photos. As I continue to age, I am changing my tradition about sharing family photos of biological kin. The ones I shared here are long dead. My goal now is to educate the few who stumble upon them.

Rudy Owens’ biological grandfather (photo date, unknown), the father of Owens’ biological father, and the author, Rudy Owens, with photo of him from September 2024

I know how these two “phantom cousins” died. Their natural deaths would be red flags to anyone who by legal right knows their family health history.

I also wanted to share a photo of me, taken in 2024, in Helsinki Finland, next to my paternal grandfather on my biological father’s side.

I described what I could learn and wanted to share in my book too about him.

He was a small-town veterinarian, who raised his family in a Midwest state, not too far from where I grew up as well. His last child, my biological father, also grew up in that small town before he went to college and then a graduate dental program to become a dentist.

In 2007 I even visited inside of their old home, where he raised his family.  It’s in a small city, and the genealogists who were my tour guides that day knew a lot of stories about him and the secrets that only small towns can nurture, unspoken but widely shared in whispers. No one in my father’s biological family, that I am aware of, know I ever visited the town where this family lived for decades.

It’s my past too, but just as phantom kin, never fully known or recognized by my severed biological family.

Update to FAQs for Michigan adoptees seeking court orders for original birth records

I have updated my frequently visited “FAQS for court order requests in Michigan for original birth certificates” webpage.* I created this in 2018 for all Michigan-born adoptees and adoptee rights advocates, lawmakers, policymakers, and the media, explaining the process for securing an original birth certificate for adoptees, especially those born between 1945 and 1980. I hope these resources are helpful and provide information that the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) will not share with tens of thousands of adoptees, as part of their concerted efforts to discriminate against this class of thousands of persons who were separated from their birth mothers and kin by this inequitable system.

In addition to updating links to MDHHS’s intentionally unhelpful web resources for adoptees, I  added this:

Will MDHHS ignore court orders to release an adoptee’s original birth certificate? [UPDATED NOV. 15, 2024]: Yes, MDHHS will ignore state law and will ignore court orders, based on my experiences requesting two additional copies of my original birth certificate in mid-August 2024. In my case, MDHHS took 80 days to release two copies of my original birth certificate after getting my order for rush service on Aug. 16, 2024. The process, as it occurred with denials and delays, violated not one but two court orders requiring MDHHS to release my vital record, as required by state law. I had to get a state court to intervene after I received a denial letter. The two birth certificates arrived on Nov. 4, 2024. (Note, I already had a standing court order from 2016 when I first won my legal fight for my vital record.) See my essay, video, and links to four other stories and videos documenting MDHHS’s actions that did not comply with state law and defied a Michigan state court and judge.

*Note, I have never made a penny from providing this resource to the public, outside of the incredibly modest sales I have of my book documenting the history of the U.S. adoption with a public health lens and how my story being separated from my biological family helps explain that system and the legal discrimination rooted in law harming millions of adoptees to this day.

Filing second request for my original birth certificate being illegally withheld by Michigan

On September 30, 2024, I submitted an additional and completely redundant court order compelling the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) Vital Records office to release two copies of my original birth certificate.

The public health officials at Vital Records already were required by state law to release these records by a court order they received in 2016. Instead, the agency chose to flagrantly disobey the law. The two copies I requested were not released, as required by state law. The agency cashed my check and then coordinated a strategy with a Michigan court how to force an adoptee to take steps that are not prescribed by law. This has been a practice, according to a court official I spoke to anonymously, for two decades—and this is illegal.

I then requested and then received in late September 2024 the necessary court order from the 3rd Circuit Court of Michigan, in Detroit, ordering MDHHS to surrender the two original birth certificates I requested. This court order already was in the agency’s files.

I mailed in that order with a letter reminding MDHHS it had received my request for my records in mid-August six weeks earlier and was failing to adhere to the law.

This has happened to other adoptees in other states, where public health bureaucrats violate law and harm adoptees intentionally, often without any consequences and certainly no investigation of willful wrongdoing in managing critical vital records of a person’s original identity—the single most important vital record of all persons.

I am now waiting for my two original birth certificate copies.

This is the third video in my series documenting the state’s handling of vital records requests by adult adoptees, specifically those who have already secured a legal court order forcing the state to release a copy of an adoptee’s original birth certificate without any barrier such as requests for additional court orders for duplicate copies. I will post another video update on how Vital Records complies, finally, or continues to remain in violation of state managing vital records.

See my first video that I posted when I filed by request for two extra copies of my original birth certificate and my video made after I filed a request for a redundant court order that is not required by law for MDHHS to release my vital record it must do by law already.

Death finally takes my birth mother, did you come to gawk at the photo?

Rudy Owens took this photograph of his birth mother in 2009; what do you see and why are you looking at it now?

The entire time I have communicated about my history as an adoptee and the widespread denial of basic human and legal rights to all adoptees, I held a line.

That demarcation point, for me, represented a conscious act of power and an act of defiance.

Until today, April 27, 2024, I have never publicly published a photograph of my closest biological family relative that showed their face.

Here it is. Are you amused? Do you care?

On a few occasions I published very old pictures of my biological grandparents, on my maternal and paternal family sides. These are so buried in my archive, they are likely impossible to find. These photos are also old, and they are more like museum artifacts than documentation of blood lineage.

But now I have arrived at a new destination, because the Angel of Death arrived late this week.

In fact, I started writing this essay when my birth mother* was among the living, a day before her passing. Now she is among the dead, having died in a Michigan hospital this week after a long declining trajectory to death’s final clutches.

SEE COMPLETE ESSAY ON THIS WEBPAGE.

Talking way too much with ‘Adoption: The Making of Me,’ and it was fun!

When I was invited to be guest on the adoptee-centered podcast Adoption: The Making of Me, produced and published by podcasters and producers Louise Browne and Sarah Reinhardt, I expected this to be something new for me.

Outside of what I have published in my adoptee memoir, I refrain publicly from talking about my backstory with my biological mother, my family life before I left home at the age 18, and issues that I don’t share when discussing adoption legislative reform and adoptee rights advocacy.

This time, I knew it would be different, and it seemed OK.

(If you prefer, you can listen to the podcast here, on Apple Podcasts.)

Browne and Reinhardt asked me to talk about topics I mostly keep private. So I did. I highlighted issues such the very bad domestic abuse in my adoptive family, which I have written about before. I also discussed other issues growing up I mostly keep private, as I focus more on legislative and upstream reforms to end the inequities of this system. 

Hopefully this conversation may help some others, which is why it seemed right to do this. Within hours of it being published I received a comment from a fellow adoptee using words to describe my experience that I never use to this day describing my life as an adoptee or my life story. That is fine, because each of us can experience a story with our own points of view.

Some of the other issues we covered include the denial of equal legal rights to domestic adoptees in my birth state Michigan and other states. I also talked about the history of my birthplace, the long-closed adoption mill and maternity hospital in Detroit called Crittenton General Hospital. I even was able to discuss my Finnish heritage and provide comparisons of the United States to Finland, homeland to my maternal great grandparents on my mother’s family side. As we closed, I managed to sneak in a few quick facts–because I love facts!–that the Finnish government and its national health service supports mothers and kids, making adoption in Finland rare and almost nonexistent.

As we nearly completed our hour-long conversation, I painfully realized I did too much of the talking without enough time for conversation, and they graciously forgave this sin.

I really appreciated the wonderful talk and these two podcasters, who are doing a brilliant job allowing adopted persons to tell stories to help others understand the adoption experience, from the point of view by those who lived it and who are the experts. You can also catch copies of their podcasts on their YouTube channel. Visit their past interviews to listen and learn from the voices of those who know this issue in the marrow of their bones.

Thanks again, ladies!